News

Eva Mendes Calls Out Kellogg’s For Harmful Ingredients, Thanks "The Food Babe" Vani Hari For Raising Awareness

Eva Mendes, the beloved actress and entrepreneur, recently took a stand against cereal giant Kellogg’s, calling out the company for the harmful ingredients found in their popular breakfast products.

By Carmen Schober2 min read
Getty/Gustavo Caballero

In a viral social media post, Mendes expressed her frustration over the pervasive use of unhealthy additives and synthetic chemicals in many of Kellogg's cereals marketed to children and families. She also thanked food activist Vani Hari, known as "The Food Babe," for raising awareness about these ingredients and pushing back against the food industry's disregard for health.

Mendes, a mother of two, wrote, "I grew up on cereal. I still love it but I won’t eat @kelloggsus anymore after I found out that so many of the ingredients they use here in the US are BANNED in other countries. Why? Because they’re harmful for children. Gracias to @thefoodbabe for helping to bring this to light and demand that Kellog remove these harmful artificial food dyes for us -just like they do in other countries."

Mendes's comments strike a chord with the growing number of Americans who are fed up with being fed products that contain harmful ingredients. In recent years, there has been increasing scrutiny of Big Food, particularly companies like Kellogg's, whose products are heavily marketed to children despite being far from nutritious. With studies linking additives and high-sugar diets to childhood obesity, ADHD, and other health issues, Mendes's message resonates with a much larger movement towards cleaner eating and more ethical food production practices.

The Influence of The Food Babe, Vani Hari

Eva Mendes didn’t just call out Kellogg’s in isolation; she acknowledged the tireless efforts of Vani Hari, the influential food activist known as The Food Babe. Hari has been a vocal critic of Big Food for years, consistently bringing attention to ingredients and practices that companies would rather keep hidden from the public.

Hari’s advocacy for cleaner labels and the elimination of harmful additives has resonated with millions of people, and Mendes's public endorsement of her work is a sign that the movement is gaining even more momentum.

Hari’s campaigns often receive pushback from defenders of Big Food, who accuse her of fearmongering or oversimplifying scientific studies. However, Hari and her supporters argue that the public deserves to know when their food contains ingredients linked to health risks, even if the industry claims these substances are “generally recognized as safe.”

The Bigger Picture: Historic Senate Hearing on Health

Earlier this year, a historic Senate hearing on public health brought together a diverse group of health advocates. The event, designed to promote honest discussions about food safety, medicine, and wellness, featured heated debates about the prevalence of toxic chemicals in everyday consumer products and their cumulative impact on public health.

Panelists at the caucus addressed how the federal government and large corporations have long colluded to undermine food quality, pointing to industry-sponsored studies and lobbying efforts that protect profits over health.

Predictably, the food industry and its defenders are pushing back. Critics accuse Mendes and Hari of inciting unnecessary fear and argue that the chemicals used in foods are present in doses deemed safe by regulatory authorities. However, such rebuttals conveniently ignore the fact that other countries have banned or limited these same ingredients due to their potential health risks, raising questions about why Americans are expected to accept lower safety standards.

Furthermore, it’s hard to ignore how Big Food has consistently prioritized profitability over consumer welfare. The $1.1 trillion food industry exerts enormous influence over nutritional guidelines and policy decisions. For instance, it is a known fact that many nutrition experts cited by large food companies receive funding directly from these corporations, which inevitably creates a conflict of interest. For many, the message is clear: it's time to prioritize transparency and consumer health over corporate interests.

Subscribe today to get unlimited access to all of Evie’s premium content.