New Lion King Remake "Mufasa" Changes Story, Makes Scar A Sympathetic Villain

The trailer for this new prequel to the 2019 photorealistic remake of The Lion King promises an epic backstory for the beloved character Mufasa. With a stellar cast that includes Donald Glover as Simba, Beyoncé Knowles-Carter as Nala, and Lin-Manuel Miranda’s involvement in creating original music, the film promises to be a visual and auditory spectacle.

But what has sparked debate is the film’s attempt to reshape Scar, one of Disney’s most evil villains, into a "complex" and sympathetic character despite his role in Mufasa's death.

Mufasa: The Lion King is set to explore the origins of Simba’s father, Mufasa, charting his rise to power as the ruler of the Pride Lands. The film’s narrative structure, according to Disney, will be framed by Rafiki, the wise baboon, recounting Mufasa’s adventures to Kiara, Simba and Nala’s daughter. This storytelling device allows the movie to switch between the past and present, providing a layered view of Mufasa’s journey.

The trailer reveals that Mufasa, voiced by Aaron Pierre, will embark on a quest with a group of misfit characters, evading a formidable foe—though details on this adversary remain under wraps. Notably absent from the trailer is any mention of Scar, Mufasa’s infamous younger brother, whose betrayal and treachery form the crux of the original Lion King narrative.

In the original 1994 animated classic, Scar is depicted as the quintessential villain—cunning, power-hungry, and ruthless, a stark contrast to Mufasa’s nobility. Traditional Lion King lore tells us that Mufasa and Scar, originally named Taka, were both sons of Ahadi, the previous king of the Pride Lands. Mufasa, as the elder brother, was always destined to rule, a fact that fueled Scar’s jealousy and resentment.

The original lore paints a clear picture: Mufasa was not an orphan, and Scar’s motivations, while understandable in the context of sibling rivalry, were never meant to justify his actions. However, with this new prequel, Disney seems to be taking creative liberties and altering this established backstory to make Scar more “relatable” and “nuanced."

Disney’s attempt to reshape Scar is part of a broader trend in recent years. The company has increasingly leaned towards giving their antagonists more sympathetic backstories with films like Maleficent and Cruella as prime examples, where classic villains are portrayed as misunderstood or wronged characters.

This reinterpretation is concerning to fans who feel that Disney’s ongoing desire to create "complex" villains deceptively distorts objective moral standards. Turning Scar into a sympathetic figure could blur the moral lines that made the original Lion King so powerful in the first place.

Another concern is that the "nuanced" depiction will actually make Scar less iconic since Scar’s appeal as a villain actually lies in his unapologetic malice—a character driven by envy and the hunger for power.

The success of this prequel will likely hinge on how well it balances the nostalgia with freshness. If Disney’s reimagining of Scar strays too far from the original, it risks alienating audiences that hold these characters dear and, ironically, diminishing the power of the story.

Evie deserves to be heard. Support our cause and help women reclaim their femininity by subscribing today.