News

"Quantum of Solace" Star Gemma Arterton Thinks A Female James Bond Would Be Outrageous: "You Just Have To Respect The Tradition"

"Isn’t a female James Bond like Mary Poppins being played by a man?” says Gemma Arterton.

By Meredith Evans2 min read
Getty/Eamonn M. McCormack

Should a woman play the iconic Agent 007? Gemma Arterton, who played Bond Girl Strawberry Fields in Quantum of Solace, thinks not. And we couldn’t agree more.

Arterton hit the nail on the head when she compared a female James Bond to a male Mary Poppins when speaking with The Times. “Isn’t a female James Bond like Mary Poppins being played by a man?” the actress asked. “They talk about it, but I think people would find it too outrageous. Sometimes you just have to respect the tradition.”

Hollywood’s obsession with rebooting, reimagining, and gender-swapping characters feels like a creative shortcut. It’s repetitive, lazy, and cringe. We’re tired of it. They keep repackaging classics with different people, slapping on a bow, and calling it "progressive."

If filmmakers really wanted a story about a cool female spy (was Black Widow not enough?), why not just write one? I think it would be more interesting to see new female characters without forcing them to fit into roles designed with a male perspective. 

Let Bond Be Bond

Bond doesn’t need fixing. In fact, his character is rooted in his maleness and masculinity, and gender-swapping him would strip away so many of the traits that made him iconic. Besides, the franchise has already made strides in modernizing its female roles. Look at No Time to Die: Ana de Armas and Lashana Lynch both brought compelling performances to the table without using the Bond name.

De Armas nailed it when she told The Sun, “There’s no need for a female Bond. There shouldn’t be any need to steal someone else’s character… What I would like is that the female roles in the Bond films are brought to life in a different way. That they’re given a more substantial part and recognition. That’s what I think is more interesting than flipping things.”

Let’s not forget that Bond’s evolution hasn’t ignored women; it’s actually grown to respect them. The early days of disposable Bond girls are behind us, and good riddance. Modern Bond films give their female characters more depth and agency, but they do it without turning Bond himself into someone unrecognizable.

As for the idea of creating female-led spy franchises, I’m not asking for it, but it would be a better alternative. Just don’t force Bond to be a woman – it will not work. Ana de Armas said it best: “Bond will continue to be a man, and that’s fine. Let’s just create more female characters and make the story fit those female characters.”

Subscribe today to get unlimited access to all of Evie’s premium content.