X/Twitter Users Lose It Over Woman Reporting UberEats Drivers Who Don’t Match Their Profiles
A woman warns that if an UberEats profile picture shows a woman but a man shows up instead, they should be reported – now she's being called a "racist" and a "Nazi."
It all started with a tweet that sent "X" (formerly Twitter) users into a frenzy. User @carbdiem brought up concerns about UberEats drivers falsifying their identities, saying, "Idc if this makes me a Karen, if your UberEats profile picture shows that you're a woman and my delivery person shows up and they're a cis man then I will report every time and so should you!!!"
Does she not have a point? If a man is at your doorstep and is not who they claimed to be, wouldn't you be worried? What if you're a woman who lives alone? Staying vigilant these days is necessary; I don't see the issue here.
But, of course, this is X we're talking about, so the mob came for her with scathing comments.
"Karen" Accusations and the Identity Debate
OnlyFans creator @zukosmadre, known for her liberal-leaning and sometimes awful takes, responded, "from the bottom of my heart, f*ck you. the undocumented people I know and love who have no other options will suffer because of your delusions that YOU will be the victim of some true crime spectacle. using 'women's safety' to endanger other marginalized groups. rethink this."
Another user, @flak_kari, accused @carbdiem of being a "snitching *ss" and added, "People lie about their identities for 'survival' purposes and to save on paying tech lords over invasive identification requirements. F*ck you goddamn Nazis to hell. 'Karen’ doesn’t begin to describe what you really are."
Then there was @_CommieMyon, who posted, "American fatties would rather become unpaid cops and report any non-white man they deem as 'off' than cook their own food."
The discourse veered away from addressing a legitimate safety concern to piling on accusations of xenophobia, classism, and every other -ism under the sun. I will say this repeatedly: Personal safety should never be compromised in the name of tolerance.
Anna Slatz from Reduxx Magazine brought some much-needed clarity: "I know this is something they ultimately have to come to understand on their own, but libfems and other women of the liberal persuasion must realize that they are simply fodder for their 'allies.' Any institution infected with liberalism would sooner sacrifice 100 women than it would slightly inconvenience a single socially destructive or dysgenic man."
Slatz continued, "The amount of women they are willing to sacrifice is proportionate to just how socially destructive or dysgenic the man is. When you reach the upper echelon of the most socially destructive, dysgenic men you can think of - imagine a lumbering undocumented black troon prostitute with a violent pedophilic criminal record a mile long - there is simply no limit to the amount of women these people are willing to let be raped, robbed, or killed. Infinity female sacrifices for the god of tolerance and comfort."
So whether it’s a delivery driver whose identity can’t be verified or inadequate background checks on immigrants, women are often the ones left vulnerable. Trusting strangers for the sake of "tolerance" without question is a luxury no one can afford anymore, least of all women. We must stay vigilant, demand accountability, and prioritize safety, even when the internet tries to shame us for doing so. Because, at the end of the day, you can’t argue about inclusivity when your safety – and your life – are on the line.
Subscribe today to get unlimited access to all of Evie’s premium content.