Mark Zuckerberg Confirms He Censored Free Speech, Says He Was "Repeatedly Pressured" By Biden-Harris Administration

Mark Zuckerberg’s recent letter to House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jim Jordan revealed troubling details about the extent of governmental influence on Meta’s content moderation practices.

Zuckerberg admitted that the Biden-Harris administration “repeatedly pressured” his company to censor certain Covid-19 content, including humor and satire.

“Senior officials from the Biden Administration, including the White House, repeatedly pressured our teams for months to censor certain Covid-19 content, including humor and satire, and expressed a lot of frustration with our teams when we didn’t agree," he wrote.

“Ultimately, it was our decision whether or not to take content down, and we own our decisions, including Covid-19-related changes we made to our enforcement in the wake of this pressure," he added. “I also think we made some choices that, with the benefit of hindsight and new information, we wouldn’t make today.”

Reflecting on the experience, Zuckerberg stated, “I believe the government pressure was wrong, and I regret that we were not more outspoken about it.” He added that Meta is now committed to pushing back if similar pressures arise in the future​.

The letter also addressed the 2020 election, when Meta temporarily demoted a New York Post story about Hunter Biden’s laptop after receiving warnings from the FBI about a possible Russian disinformation operation. Zuckerberg wrote, “It’s since been made clear that the reporting was not Russian disinformation, and in retrospect, we shouldn’t have demoted the story.”

He added that Meta has since changed its policies, noting, “We no longer temporarily demote things in the U.S. while waiting for fact-checkers."

“I feel strongly that we should not compromise our content standards due to pressure from any Administration in either direction—and we’re ready to push back if something like this happens again," he concluded. “My goal is to be neutral and not play a role one way or another—or to even appear to be playing a role.”

Zuckerberg’s admissions have sparked mixed reactions. Many are speculating whether he is acting out of honor, distancing himself from the Democratic Party, or preemptively addressing a potential whistleblower, but regardless of his motivations, the consequences of Meta's censorship are devastating, as is the confirmation that the Biden-Harris administration allegedly coerced a private company into doing their bidding.

It also highlights the urgent need for accountability. Throughout the pandemic, key figures in the Biden-Harris administration, including Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas, publicly dismissed concerns about government interference in content moderation, labeling them as "conspiracy theories." Yet, Zuckerberg’s admission directly contradicts these denials, revealing that high-level officials did, in fact, pressure Meta to censor certain content.

This situation demands accountability. Zuckerberg, who has historically supported Democratic candidates—including through significant financial contributions—must now face scrutiny for his role in enabling this government overreach. In 2020, Zuckerberg donated hundreds of millions of dollars to election infrastructure, a move that was widely criticized as being partisan despite his claims of neutrality​. Now, with his own admissions of being swayed by government pressure, it is clear that these actions are a significant breach of public trust.

The question that looms large is whether Zuckerberg, as well as the government officials involved, will be held accountable. The selective censorship during the pandemic, the demotion of the Hunter Biden laptop story, and the subsequent deception about these practices are the most prevalent forms of "disinformation" deceiving Americans.

If figures like Mayorkas can lie to the public and if tech moguls like Zuckerberg can influence elections while claiming neutrality, the principles of transparency and fairness in our democracy are at risk. To restore trust, there must be consequences. Whether through legal means, public pressure, or Congressional oversight, those involved in this deception should be held responsible.

Zuckerberg's letter is just the beginning; it opens the door for a much-needed investigation into the extent of collusion between Big Tech and the government.

Subscribe today to get unlimited access to all of Evie’s premium content.